Search for anisotropic birefringent spacetime-symmetry breaking in gravitational wave propagation from GWTC-3

2025-04-15 0 0 1.21MB 11 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Search for anisotropic, birefringent spacetime-symmetry breaking in gravitational
wave propagation from GWTC-3
Le¨ıla Haegel
Universit´e Paris Cit´e, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, F-75013 Paris, France
Kellie O’Neal-Aultand Quentin G. Bailey
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ, 86301, USA
Jay D. Tasson and Malachy Bloom
Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA
Lijing Shao
Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
(Dated: September 8, 2023)
An effective field theory framework, the Standard-Model Extension, is used to investigate the
existence of Lorentz and CPT-violating effects during gravitational wave propagation. We implement
a modified equation for the dispersion of gravitational waves, that includes isotropic, anisotropic
and birefringent dispersion. Using the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA algorithm library suite, we perform a
joint Bayesian inference of the source parameters and coefficients for spacetime symmetry breaking.
From a sample of 45 high confidence events selected in the GWTC-3 catalog, we obtain a maximal
bound of 3.19×1015 m at 90% CI for the isotropic coefficient k(5)
(V)00 when assuming the anisotropic
coefficients to be zero. The combined measurement of all the dispersion parameters yields limits
on the order of 1013 m for the 16 k(5)
(V)ij coefficients. We study the robustness of our inference by
comparing the constraints obtained with different waveform models, and find that a lack of physics
in the simulated waveform may appear as spacetime symmetry breaking-induced dispersion for a
subset of events.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the search for a fundamental unified theory of
physics, it may be imperative to reconsider the axioms
underlying General Relativity (GR) and the Standard
Model (SM) of particle physics. Many theoretical propos-
als argue for a possible breaking of spacetime symmetries,
including Lorentz invariance (LI) and Charge-Parity-
Time (CPT) symmetry [1–6], in such a way that it may
be detectable in sensitive tests. The direct detections
of gravitational waves (GWs) reported by the LIGO-
Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) collaboration provide a new chan-
nel to test the rich phenomenology induced by spacetime-
symmetry breaking in the gravitation sector [7–11].
The effective field theory referred to as the Standard-
Model Extension (SME) is a theoretical framework dedi-
cated to derive the observable consequences of spacetime-
symmetry breaking that is punctilious and model in-
dependent. The framework is comprised of the action
of GR and the SM plus all possible terms obtainable
from GR and SM field operators contracted with coeffi-
cients for spacetime-symmetry breaking, including local
Lorentz, CPT, and diffeomorphism breaking terms [12–
21]. Extensive constraints have been derived on these
l.haegel@ip2i.in2p3.fr
aultk@my.erau.edu
baileyq@erau.edu
terms within the matter sector and in the gravity sec-
tor [22], the latter having been studied with a wide range
of astrophysical probes [15, 19, 20, 23–25]. Existing anal-
ysis includes short-range gravity tests [26–28], gravimetry
tests [29–35], astrophysical tests with pulsars [36–38], so-
lar system planetary tests [39–41], near-Earth tests [42–
45], and tests with GWs [19, 46–51]. We complement
those searches with further study of the LI and CPT-
violating effects on propagation of GW. We use dynam-
ical equations for the metric fluctuations derived from
the action of the SME, and the resulting effects include
dispersion, anisotropy, and birefringence.
Several tests of GR have been performed with the GW
events detected by the LVK [47–50, 52–54]. Some re-
lated works focus on parameterizations of the deviations
from GR [9, 10, 55, 56], including waveform consistency
tests, modification of the GW generation, presence of
extra polarization modes, and tests using specific mod-
els [55, 57–62]. The current searches for LI violation
performed by the LVK collaboration notably rely on a
modified dispersion relation that includes isotropic and
polarization-independent effects [53, 63, 64]. Using the
SME framework, we extend this phenomenology by mea-
suring the coefficients for LI and CPT violation, including
anisotropic and polarization-dependent dispersion. First
estimates of those coefficients have been derived using
posterior probabilities released with previous GW catalog
releases, effectively neglecting the correlations between
the parameters describing the source and the spacetime-
arXiv:2210.04481v2 [gr-qc] 7 Sep 2023
2
symmetry breaking coefficients [49, 50]. In this article,
we present a joint measurement of the source parameters
and the coefficients, alongside studying the robustness of
the results we obtain.
Section II summarizes the derivation of the phe-
nomenology induced by LI and CPT violation in the
SME framework. Section III details the methodologi-
cal aspects, including the dataset used for the measure-
ment of the spacetime-symmetry breaking coefficients.
Section IV presents the obtained results, as well as a
discussion of the impact of the underlying gravitational
waveform model and correlations with source parame-
ters. Section V discusses those results in light of existing
studies and future GW instrument sensitivities. Theo-
retical portions of this paper work with natural units,
where =c= 1 and Newton’s gravitational constant is
GN̸= 1, while our data analysis work follows SI units.
Greek letters are used for spacetime indices while Latin
letters for spatial indices. We work with the spacetime
metric signature (,+,+,+).
II. THEORETICAL DERIVATION OF A
DISPERSION RELATION FOR
GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
We summarize previous derivations in [19, 65, 66], fo-
cusing on gravity-sector terms within the SME frame-
work. The spacetime metric is expanded as fluctuations
about the Minkowski metric, gµν =hµν +ηµν , and we
consider up to second order in hµν for the action, which is
sufficient to characterize propagation effects. This gives
the following action:
I=1
8κZd4x hµν ˆ
K(d)µνρσ hρσ.(1)
The operator ˆ
K(d)µνρσ , consists of partial derivatives
that act on hµν ,
ˆ
K(d)µνρσ =K(d)µνρσϵ1...ϵd2ϵ1...∂ϵd2,(2)
and K(d)µνρσϵ1...ϵd2are general background coefficients
that are considered small, constant and control the size
of any Lorentz or CPT violation;
Ensuring linearized gauge symmetry, i.e., hµν hµν +
µξν+νξµ, and retaining only terms that contribute to
the resulting field equations, we arrive at the following
Lagrange density [19]:
L=1
8κϵµρακϵνσβληκλhµν αβhρσ
+1
8κhµν (ˆsµρνσ + ˆqµρνσ +ˆ
kµρνσ )hρσ.(3)
The first term is the standard GR term written with the
totally antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensor density ϵµρακ,
and the remaining terms contain all additional Lorentz
invariant and violating terms, organized into three terms
based on symmetry properties: ˆsis CPT even with mass
dimension d4; ˆqis CPT odd with mass dimension d
5; ˆ
kis CPT even with mass dimension d6. Details of
these terms including the corresponding Young Tableaux
can be found in Table 1 of Ref. [19]. As an example, for
mass dimension 5,
ˆqµρνσ =q(5)µρϵνζσκϵζκ,(4)
where q(5)µρϵνζσκ has 60 independent components. Note
that the gauge symmetry requirement can be relaxed [20,
67], but we do not consider such terms here. The ori-
gin of the effective action for hµν resulted from explicit
symmetry breaking or spontaneous-symmetry breaking
as discussed elsewhere [15, 19, 68, 69].
Performing the variation with respect to hµν on the
action (3), results in the vacuum field equations,
0 = Gµν [1
4(ˆsµρνσ + ˆsµσνρ) + 1
2ˆ
kµνρσ
+1
8(ˆqµρνσ + ˆqνρµσ + ˆqµσνρ + ˆqνσµρ)] hρσ .(5)
Assuming plane wave solutions, ¯
hµν =Aµν eipαxα,
where xµis spacetime position and pµ= (ω, ⃗p) is the
four-momentum for the plane wave, and transforming
into momentum space with α=ipαthe dispersion
relation can be obtained independently of gauge condi-
tions, as shown in references [20, 70]. The dispersion
relation for the two propagating modes is given by
ω=|p|1ζ0± |
ζ|,(6)
where
|
ζ|=p(ζ1)2+ (ζ2)2+ (ζ3)2(7)
and
ζ0=1
4|p|2ˆsµν µν +1
2ˆ
kµν µν ,
(ζ1)2+ (ζ2)2=1
8|p|4ˆ
kµνρσ ˆ
kµνρσ ˆ
kµρ νρ ˆ
kµσ νσ
+1
8ˆ
kµν µν ˆ
kρσ ρσ,
(ζ3)2=1
16|p|41
2ˆqµρνσ ˆqµρνσ ˆqµνρσ ˆqµνρσ
+(ˆqµρν ρ+ ˆqνρµ ρ)ˆqµσν σ).(8)
We retrieve the GR case when symmetry-breaking co-
efficients, i.e. ζ0and |
ζ|, vanish. Note that this result
holds at leading order in the coefficients for Lorentz vi-
olation, hence higher modes do not contribute in this
perturbative treatment [20, 70]. Relaxing some of the
assumptions in this framework, allowing for other fields
to contribute dynamically to the action, could result in
additional modes [71, 72].
GR predicts two linearly independent polarizations for
GWs propagating in vacuum, traveling at the speed of
light. Possible modifications for observable Lorentz and
CPT violating effects from (6) include birefringence, e.g.,
altered relative travel speeds between the polarizations,
which result from the two possible signs for |
ζ|in (6), re-
quiring a minimum mass dimension 5. Furthermore, the
3
presence of higher powers of frequency and momentum
in the terms above, indicates beyond GR dispersion as
well. All of these effects depend on the sky location of
the propagating wave, and thus a breaking of rotational
isotropy occurs.
To take into account the sky localization dependence
of the source in the detector frame, it is advantageous
to project the SME coefficients onto spherical harmon-
ics [70],
ζ0=X
djm
ωd4Yjm(ˆ
n)k(d)
(I)jm,(9)
ζ1i ζ2=X
djm
ωd4±4Yjm(ˆ
n)k(d)
(E)jm ±ik(d)
(B)jm,(10)
ζ3=X
djm
ωd4Yjm(ˆ
n)k(d)
(V)jm,(11)
where jmj, the Yjm(ˆ
n) are the standard spheri-
cal harmonics while ±4Yjm(ˆ
n) are spin-weighted spheri-
cal harmonics, and ˆn=ˆp.
Expressions for the two linearly independent GW po-
larizations, in the transverse-traceless gauge, result in a
phase shift from the additional symmetry-breaking ef-
fects,
h(+) =e(cos βisin ϑcos φsin β)hLI
(+)
esin β(cos ϑ+isin ϑsin φ)hLI
(×)
h(×)=e(cos β+isin ϑcos φsin β)hLI
(×)
+esin β(cos ϑisin ϑsin φ)hLI
(+).(12)
where
δ=ωd3τζ(d)0,
β=ωd3τ|
ζ(d)|,
and the modified redshift becomes
τ=Zz
0
dz (1 + z)d4
H(z).(13)
For notational convenience, the angles in (12) are defined
by the expressions below,
sin ϑ=|ζ12|
|
ζ|,cos ϑ=ζ3
|
ζ|, e=ζ12
(ζ1)2+(ζ2)2.
(14)
One of the key features of spacetime symmetry break-
ing, as evidenced in the equations above, is the breaking
of isotropy. The strength of the LI violation can change
with source location [66]. Unless otherwise stated, the
spherical coefficients in (9)-(11) are expressed in the Sun-
Centered Celestial Equatorial reference frame (SCF), as
is standard in the literature [22, 73], and allows com-
parisons with other non-GW tests in the gravity sector.
Rotations and boosts of the spherical coefficients relative
to this frame must be taken into account, as discussed
elsewhere [74].
III. DATA AND PARAMETER INFERENCE
A. Bayesian inference of source and
symmetry-breaking parameters
For mass dimension 4, LI violation leads to a modifi-
cation of the GW group velocity that can be measured
with multimessenger signals; constraints on the ˆsopera-
tor of Eq. (3) have been obtained from the observation of
GW170817/GRB170817A [47] comparing light and GW
travel time, and travel time across the Earth [48].
In this analysis, we focus on the coefficients for Lorentz
and CPT violation contained in the operator ˆqfor d= 5
(see Eq (5)), with the first mass dimension in the action
series (3) where GW dispersion occurs. We probe the
impact of isotropic and anisotropic dispersion, as well
as birefringence, with a joint estimation of the source
parameters and the 16 a priori independent k(5)
(V)ij coef-
ficients of Eq. (11). Specifically, we are considering in
this work, a subset of (12), where δ= 0. In this case the
remaining coefficients are contained in β. The expression
is lengthy but takes the form [66]:
β(5) =ω2τ(5)
2π
k(5)
(V)00 q3
2sin θek(5)
(V)11 +ek(5)
(V)11
+3 cos θ k(5)
(V)10 +...
,(15)
with the superscript (5) meaning all quantities are eval-
uated with d= 5 like equation (13).
Using a Bayesian inference framework, we compare the
strain detected by the LVK interferometers with a tem-
plate bank of gravitational waveforms modified as out-
lined in Eq. (12). The strain takes the form,
SA=F(+)h(+) +F(×)h(×),(16)
where h(+,×)are the expressions (12), and F(+,×)are the
standard detector response functions. The rotation an-
gles relating different frames, are included in the expres-
sions for F(+,×). These are defined in the LALSuite soft-
ware, including the source frame and the detector frame.
Again, the coefficients k(5)
(V)ij in (15) are left in the SCF.
We use the LALSuite algorithm package, modifying the
LALSimulation subpackage to generate dispersed wave-
forms and performing the parameter estimation with a
custom version of LALInference [75]. For a single event,
LALInference evaluates the posterior probability with a
Markov chain process using the matched-filtered likeli-
hood:
P(d|
θGR,
θSM E , I) = exp X
i2|˜
di˜
hi(
θGR ,
θSM E )|2
T Sn(fi)
1
2log πT Sn(fi)
2
(17)
where ˜
hiis the template signal, ˜
diis the interferome-
ter datastream, Tis the duration of the signal, and Sn
摘要:

Searchforanisotropic,birefringentspacetime-symmetrybreakingingravitationalwavepropagationfromGWTC-3Le¨ılaHaegel∗Universit´eParisCit´e,CNRS,AstroparticuleetCosmologie,F-75013Paris,FranceKellieO’Neal-Ault†andQuentinG.Bailey‡Embry-RiddleAeronauticalUniversity,Prescott,AZ,86301,USAJayD.TassonandMalachyB...

展开>> 收起<<
Search for anisotropic birefringent spacetime-symmetry breaking in gravitational wave propagation from GWTC-3.pdf

共11页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:学术论文 价格:10玖币 属性:11 页 大小:1.21MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-15

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 11
客服
关注